<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://pucir.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/740" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://pucir.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/740</id>
  <updated>2025-10-30T12:30:41Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2025-10-30T12:30:41Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>A Durable Peace with a Weak Accord in Mizoram</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://pucir.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/741" />
    <author>
      <name>Lalnundika</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://pucir.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/741</id>
    <updated>2024-06-14T09:39:00Z</updated>
    <published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: A Durable Peace with a Weak Accord in Mizoram
Authors: Lalnundika
Abstract: On June 30, 2020, Mizoram celebrated thirty-four years of peace after the signing of&#xD;
the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) of 1986, popularly known as the Mizo&#xD;
Accord that put an end to the twenty-year-long Mizo war of independence&#xD;
spearheaded by the Mizo National Front (MNF). The Accord, often hailed in both the&#xD;
political and the academic fora as the most successful agreement of the Indian state&#xD;
with an armed insurgent group and a model of conflict resolution, has in fact&#xD;
withstood the test of time, generating durable peace. This article, however, debunks&#xD;
the idea of the Mizo Accord as a model agreement by underlining its defects and nonimplementation,&#xD;
and rather argues that sustainable peace in the state of Mizoram was&#xD;
possible due to the social administrative system and political culture of the Mizos,&#xD;
largely shaped and molded by civil society organizations</summary>
    <dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

