<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://pucir.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/462" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://pucir.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/462</id>
  <updated>2026-05-21T02:47:59Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-05-21T02:47:59Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>First Person Authority and the Problem of Other Minds</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://pucir.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/463" />
    <author>
      <name>Naik, Kailashkanta</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://pucir.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/463</id>
    <updated>2024-06-10T09:56:24Z</updated>
    <published>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: First Person Authority and the Problem of Other Minds
Authors: Naik, Kailashkanta
Abstract: In recent times Donald Davidson has extensively&#xD;
discussed the concept of ‘special authority’&#xD;
regarding one's mental states. He takes up different topics&#xD;
of the philosophy of mind and interprets them from a new&#xD;
standpoint. This paper is the outcome how the understanding&#xD;
of first person authority enables us to understand&#xD;
the problem related to other minds. In this regard I have&#xD;
explained how first person authority is guaranteed by explaining&#xD;
how a belief statement expressed by two individual&#xD;
will have the same truth value. If this is proven to be&#xD;
true then the first individual expressing his belief statement&#xD;
will be said to have authority. Though proving the&#xD;
belief statement of the first individual by taking up of the&#xD;
same statement by another individual and proving it to be&#xD;
true is not as simple as that. However, the paper gives a&#xD;
detail account as to how it is possible and then explains&#xD;
the problem related to other minds. The paper sums up by&#xD;
taking up the Principle of Charity where the speaker’s belief&#xD;
is considered to be true and the interpreter believes&#xD;
that the speaker is a rational being who knows what he&#xD;
speaks and if he knows what he speaks, he knows what&#xD;
belief he holds to be true.</summary>
    <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

